Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROH Death Before Dishonor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ROH Death Before Dishonor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable internet video content. Speedy was removed without addressing concern, so article was Proded. It was then deproded by the article creator without addressing the issue. No claims of notability, and am unable to locate reliable source coverage to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I just want to clarify why I opted to contest the speedy deletion. This in an article about an apparently annual wrestling event started in 2003 which was broadcast online the last 3 times. My concern, which I expressed to the nominator on their talk page, was that this did not qualify for A7, because it is essentially a sporting/entertainment event, something that does not within the A7 criterion, the fact that three of the events were broadcast online does not make the parent article web content. An article about one of the events before they were broadcast online would not be web content per A7, it is odd that the parent article would. If all of this is a mistake, well, I do make mistakes, I just don't see that this was one of them.

All of this says nothing about the notability of the article in question, but I thought it was worth saying. Quasi human | Talk 17:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability not established through third party sources. --CutOffTies (talk) 22:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As Quasihuman has stated, this is a "annual wrestling event" by ROH. It has received coverage in reliable secondary sources http://www.f4wonline.com/more/more-top-stories/96-wwe/13795-feedback-to-roh-death-before-dishonor- http://www.pwtorch.com/artman2/publish/Torch_Flashbacks_19/article_50935.shtml http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1314643404 but I'm not sure how the article can cite them. Starship.paint (talk) 08:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 00:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Coverage found by Starship.paint is from highly specialized sources, but they do appear to be reliable and independent. Hobit (talk) 05:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.